|
Keesal, Young & Logan’s attorneys regularly represent and consult with corporate
and individual clients regarding the scope and impact of the laws relating to unfair
business practices, including the effect of such laws on non-competition and non-solicitation
agreements.
Our attorneys have defended financial services clients (including mutual funds companies,
securities firms, banks and other lenders), magazine publishers, corporate consulting
firms, insurance companies and other business entities that have been accused of
unfair business practices. We have sought enforcement of non-competition and non-solicitation
agreements in connection with employment matters, mergers and asset acquisitions. In addition, we have pursued and defended trade secret, contractual interference
and trade libel litigation involving corporate competitors and their employees.
Finally, our attorneys have significant experience litigating matters relating to
California’s Unfair Competition Law (Business and Professions Code section 17200,
et seq.). For example, nine years before the California Court of Appeal held in
2005 that California’s Unfair Competition Law did not apply to securities transactions,
Keesal,
Young & Logan had already established this principle in the United States District
Court and in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Among the recent results obtained by our attorneys in this area are the following:
- Obtained a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction and contempt sanctions
in United States District Court for a financial services firm against a departed
senior manager who joined a direct competitor of the firm.
- Obtained a dismissal of trade secret and trade libel claims against employees of
a financial services firm brought by its competitor, and an award of six figures
in attorney’s fees against the competitor for asserting a bad faith trade secret
claim.
- Obtained a temporary restraining order for a securities firm prohibiting nine former
employees from soliciting clients and utilizing trade secrets.
- Obtained a preliminary injunction prohibiting the use of confidential information
for a large commercial insurance brokerage firm against a team of former brokers
who left to join a competitor.
- Obtained a dismissal of a Business and Professions Code section 17200 claim for
a multinational
client based upon recent changes in non-competition laws (Proposition 64).
For additional information, please contact:
|